6 Reviews for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech

← Back to JOOLA Rhyzm Tech

Sort by Most Useful | Most Recent ▼

Add a Review

Review by ccuadra77 (Verified Customer) for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on March 14, 2019

Good Rubber nice spin

Review helpful? Yes | No

External Review for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on November 29, 2018

I play with it for less than a year on FH side, and Joola Octopus for BH side. It's very good for the modern defensive players because its high rotation effect on the ball and relatively low speed compared to Butterfly Tenergy 05 as a good model for a spinny but also very fast.

Review helpful? Yes | No

External Review for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on October 8, 2018

Update (from 2018): I am now playing the Rhyzm-Tech since 5 days on a Butterfly Timo Boll ALC blade.
Facts: black rubber with 2 mm thickness (uncut 66 g.), sponge hardness 42,5 degree, total hardness (- thank you Spin & Speed!!!) 50,9 degree. Weight, cut by 150 x 156 mm, 47 g.
In retrospect, what surprises me is that this rubber was touted as very fast. - this in my opinion nonsens! But no rubber before gave my service so much rotation (probably due to the very soft upper rubber !!!)and it was never been easier for me to return the opponent service !!! I would describe this wonderful rubber as indulgent and very safe. - ... and the first spin machine, I have played to 2019.
Thanks to JOOLA !!!! - ... my game has really become safer and I got more success.
Addendum: This rubber also has excellent durability !!!! - 5 months were not a problem.
2021 Addendum: after I have tested a lot of other rubbers since then, I am seriously considering, whether I should buy this rubber again soon. ... in max. tense! ;) :-P

Review helpful? Yes | No

Review by rustam2772 (Verified Customer) for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on April 16, 2017

decided to give a try to this manufacture since it was a time to change the rubber and i like to try different ones. totally disagree with the characteristics given here.
Speed: 118 (FAST/EXTREME)
Spin: 120 (High/Extra High)
Control:High/ Extra High
as for me, i would cut these numbers in HALF. much slower and less spiny than my previous rubbers: donic blue fire p1 or killerspin fortismo. control is good, but definitely not high as mentioned here. Plus, it makes some sound i guess because of peculiarities of the sponge.
i am not satisfied by this rubber and would not recommend it.

Review helpful? Yes | No

External Review for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on November 24, 2015

Have played with the RT in Max thickness on my BH on an Off carbon blade and I've played very well with it. It has plenty of speed and spin, and the control is fine. I can brush loop and drive my loops with it. The throw angle is definitely higher than the other Rhyzm rubbers. I didn't rate the durability because I've only had it 1 week, but I suspect it will be good since the regular Rhyzm rubbers have good durability. I do disagree with the previous review though that says it's pretty much the same as the "P" series. I have played with the "P" Rhyzm rubber and it doesn't have the spin this rubber does. This rubber is much better IMO than the Rhyzm P rubber. I've let a couple of 2200 players hit with it on their BH and FH and both said they felt like they couldn't miss. Give this rubber a try, you'll like it!

Review helpful? Yes | No

External Review for JOOLA Rhyzm Tech on November 20, 2015

I played with Rhyzm P 2.0 for just over a year. Wanted to upgrade and gain a little speed. Tried tech max on both fh and bh. I couldn't control bh so I switched to 1.8 thickness. Which gained control for me and made it useable. To be honest it feels almost identical to the rhyzm p. Sponge is white and pores are maybe bigger? I was very happy with P version and I'm happy with tech. I think they are identical with the exception of tech has slightly softer sponge 42.5 vs 45 of Rhyzm P. I would expect very long durability just like the P. Tried on rossi emotion and Tpe perform

Review helpful? Yes | No

← Back to JOOLA Rhyzm Tech