10% off orders of 2 or more JOOLA rubber sheets. Your discount will appear on the shopping cart.
15% off if you add a JOOLA blade (discount on entire combo). See Recommended JOOLA Combos.
Help us keep the best prices! Report a lower price.
The Rhyzm-P is ideal for the aggressive players, who plays an aggressive game with extreme speed and spin.
P like precision, P like professional, P like Poly-ball
GeoGrip-Power-Technology is used - this develops significantly more grip of the ball for more spin due to an intense friction surface structure.
Find out for yourself, use the P's in your game and become even more successful!
RHYZM - on the market for 2 years and already nearly a classic! The focus fell on development and improvement of the sponge up until now, whereas here a much improved rubber surface has been precisely worked upon. This has leaded to the rubber having substantially more grip, with which not only more spin can be generated, but also better control and the durability is improved.
Ideal also for use with the new Poly-ball.
Customers who purchased JOOLA Rhyzm-P also purchased:
Rubber FAQ and Guide - what you need to know when buying rubber sheets.
Compare rubber ratings - compare ratings to other sheets.
Racket Assembly Limitation: We regret that we currently can only assemble this rubber sheet to a JOOLA blade.
Best Price Guarantee We guarantee to have the lowest prices (shipping included) in the US. Please tell us if you find a lower price.
Reviews of JOOLA Rhyzm-P (8)
Add a Review for JOOLA Rhyzm-P.
Very good for backhand and very very durable. I use it with T05 (FH) on Joola Rossi Emotion blade. Very very happy
What a brilliant backhand rubber! for my playing style ( lots of punches, blocks and the occasional heavily spinning loop) this is perfect. previously, i was using tenergy 25 on my Bh which was great until it started getting too worn so attacking backspin was getting more and more difficult. Not willing to play 50 for another i decided to try this rubber. Straight away i felt the increase in power and spin and grip on the rubber, not only was it faster and produced more spin, but it was a lot lighter than the 25 which had thick pimples. However, being used to the more deadened 25, a few shots were going long. as of this i wouldn't recommend this rubber for anyone who isn't at a strong level (technically strong) as it may be too fast for them. It is a tad bouncy if you are trying to do short shots but you should get used to this. like i said i would recommend a slower rubber like sriver if you are relatively new to the sport :) I hope you like this rubber as much as i do, it may not be for everyone.
Excellent rubber with outstanding speed ,spin and control. It is very suitable in short range rally both in rpb or in push , and also this rubber give me a really good feel in touching the ball and can more easier control the ball and i think this rubber really match in my eternity vps v. Very recommended to people that like to counter topspin with high control
nicknamed "the rubber from the heavens". a choice rubber indeed. i knew a legend, he chose this rubber along with DHS POWER.G PG7 blade. It was a monstrous set up he had. his chops triggered hurricanes and storms,his serves made the earth rotate because of the intense spin, and his topspins,loops, and attacks triggered widespread calamity that took thousands of human life. If you want to be a god, go buy this rubber stick it with DHS power.G pg7 and start causing some real calamity, with this rubber, you will be unstoppable, even ma long will bow his head in shame after witnessing this rubber's capabilities, but this rubber's potential will not be unlocked, unless you stick it with a DHS POWER.G PG7 blade. Oh what a monstrous rubber indeed!
Very good rubber. Very good price. The only problem is that it dosent last to much but with a off blade it combines perfectly creativo a balance bettwen speed, sin and control.
Joola Rhyzm-P is perfect and not only for plastic balls. I use it on forehand, tried it on 3 blades and it is best on carbon blades. Great amount of spin in loops and serves, , good feeling in short game, blocking is very easy, everything is good. It may be my technique but the spin in my loops is enormous, more spin than with other rubbers like tenergy 80, yasaka mark V or dhs hurricane 3 neo....I am excited about this rubber.
I used to use this in Butterfly Amultart blade, now I'm using it to my Xiom Hayabusa ZX blade 95g put in FH and it's perfect, this rubber is perfect for fast blades. It has lots of spins and control. Highly recommended to all types of player out there...
Rhyzm-P and Maxxx-P review:
I have used several versions of Rhyzms and Maxxx's in the past and all I can say these 2 are unlike any other rubbers that I have tried. I used an Ebenholz 5 blade and Avenger 5 on both rubbers as test blades.
Rhyzm-Pweight: 68 grams uncut (approx)
hardness: 45 degrees
Weight: 65 grams uncut (approx.)
Hardness: 42.5 degrees
As I opened the 2 rubbers I was in for a surprise of my life. I was expecting the usual different sponge topsheet combination but Joola has made a different design on these 2 rubbers in a very simple but elegant to look at. Large enough logos and names are very nice to look at. The topsheets of the 2 rubbers seem a little different from their predecessors in which the rubbers have a different texture and there is this increased quality that I have noticed. The sponge of the Rhyzm-P is different from the old Rhyzms because it is more porous. Also that the previous Rhyzms are in white and this is in orange. Maxxx-P is the opposite, the Maxxx 500 sponge sample that I have has a larger pore compared the Maxxx-P.
I have used the Joola 3 star celluloid ball and the DHS 40+ polyball for testing both rubbers and here are my thoughts:
Rhyzm-P is faster than Maxxx-P by several notches. During drives and counterhitting, The speed of the Rhyzm-P is really evident when hitting through the sponge. I think Rhyzm-P is almost or in the same level of speed compared with the original Rhyzm but with a softer feel. The Maxxx-P felt faster noticeably than the previous Maxxx 450. I dunno if the cause is the topsheet but both Rhyzm-P and Maxxx-P felt harder than 45 and 42.5 degrees respectively. When I used the DHS 40+ ball on both rubbers, both have low trajectory with Rhyzm as having the lower one. I would categorize their throw as Maxxx-P low to medium throw and Rhyzm-P as low throw. Middle distance, both rubbers are good and no decrease in speed in power has been observed but far from the table the Rhyzm-P really stands out. Rhyzm has this sharp trajectory upon hitting the ball with flat hits or spin drives. Maxxx-P has an arching effect.
Both Maxxx-P and Rhyzm-P are a notch above their previous versions. For the celluloid balls, the Maxxx-P is like a combined Maxxx 450 and 500 in spin generation. I really find the Maxxx 500 spinny in terms of looping like using a chinese rubber which is more on a brushing stroke against the ball while the Maxxx 450 is also spinny but you need to hit more through the sponge and use the sponge more also to produce spin. Both of these properties by 2 different rubbers can be found in Maxxx-P. The Rhyzm-P is not far behind in terms of spin compared to Maxxx. I thought this was just another fast rubber with more emphasis on speed and less on spin blah, blah but I was wrong and was quite surprised. This version of the Rhyzm is very spinny. The previous rhyzms are spinny but not in the level of the P version. This one seems easier to produce spin also. What made me shun away from the previous Rhyzm versions is that the 48 degree version was too fast and the others were not too spinny. I think people who love the Rhyzm 48 will love the Rhyzm-P more simply because it is spinnier, easier to produce spin and more forgiving when looping. Same goes with the Maxxx-P.
Now the question is, were they still good in spin with the DHS 40+ ball? YES! and it is a BIG YES! I tested a lot of spinny loops on all contact points and timings on the table and all I can say is that both rubbers have a very good potential in spinning the polyball. I was wondering though even if they are very spinny both arcs of the Maxxx-P and Rhyzm-P still remained low to medium only. Although my loops were spinnier when I used the Joola 3 star celluloid ball, with the DHS 40+ there are still lots of spin left but only by a very small fraction. I could still feel the difference and even the student of mine who was blocking against my loop. At least there wasn't a large loss of spin when using a polyball. The Rhyzm-P was stronger when taking the ball on the rise and peak while Maxxx-P was better when looping the ball peak and late contact. When compared to the Evolution series, I think both rubbers have more or less equal spin.
controlled blocking against attacks: Maxxx-P
active blocking or punch blocking: Rhyzm-P
drop shots: Maxxx-P
serves: more or less equal in spin
So for both rubbers I give them a 2 thumbs up I am verryyyyyy impressed! Although I love the Maxxx-P more, I was more surprised and impressed with the Rhyzm-P because it felt more balanced in terms of offensive capabilities at the same time being forgiving. I guess Joola has produced their own versions of rubbers that are polyball ready. I recommend the Rhyzm-P if you hit middle to far distance from the table and Maxxx-P is you still want to spin a lot when using the new polyball. I am also expecting this to be very durable. The previous Maxxx and Rhyzm versions lasts very long and a lot of people appreciates their durability especially the Rhyzm series.
Table Tennis Rubber