-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Oversized Rackets
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
- Cases
- Cleaners
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
-
Apparel
-
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- MK
- Newgy
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- Sponeta
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
| Return to Topic Index |
Blade recommendation (14)
Re: Blade recommendationby ZoranV 20 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: Blade recommendation) was posted by ZoranV, on 8/8/2005 3:40:53 PM:
| you yorself said that slower carbon blades dont make sence, but from your point of view - need for speed only- but slow carbons egsist so apparently "need for speed" is NOT the only reason. Have you ever play with some slow carbon - I have 3 of them : vsg4000, waldner senso carbon and gruba carbon. no wood blade is the same, two carbons are much more similar then two wood blades of the same type. So one more reason is consistency. Another obvious reason is big sweet spot. third, someone like it thin and carbons are much thiner then wood blades... eventuali lighter also...you should try some balsa carbon or gruba carbon... dwell time is big minus, but maybe the only one! |