729 vs nittaku (6)

729 vs nittaku
by John K. 17 years ago

Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Jerry 17 years ago

Re: 729 vs nittaku
by John K. 17 years ago

Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago

Re: 729 vs nittaku
by debraj 17 years ago

Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago

The following message (subject: Re: 729 vs nittaku) was posted by Mike Oxbent, on 1/8/2007 8:55:50 AM:

I am not suggesting that people shouldn't buy Chinese rubber at all. I am suggesting that people should consider where they buy them from. If you buy from a reputable supplier I think that the quality is better because the supplier can also check the rubbers as many Chinese rubbers can be opened and re-sealed. But this costs more. If you buy direct from China it is much cheaper but you run the risk that an occasional rubber will be of poor quality.
As I said, I have bought hundreds of rubbers and only a few have had problems:-
Palio cj8000-dull topsheet
Palio ck531a-very brittle and many pimples fell off after a short practice.
729 Faster(old transcend)-hard area in the sponge.
729 Faster(old transcend)-surface dull on opening.
Sprungfeder G3-Damage to rubber surface.
Inspirit-Dark patches in the red rubber.
I personally always use Chinese rubbers and each of the above problems only represents a single rubber not all rubbers of that type.

Report Abuse