Return to Topic Index |
729 vs nittaku (1)
729 vs nittaku
by John K. 17 years ago
by John K. 17 years ago
Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Jerry 17 years ago
by Jerry 17 years ago
Re: 729 vs nittaku
by John K. 17 years ago
by John K. 17 years ago
Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago
Re: 729 vs nittaku
by debraj 17 years ago
by debraj 17 years ago
Re: 729 vs nittaku
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago
by Mike Oxbent 17 years ago
The following message (subject: 729 vs nittaku) was posted by John K., on 1/7/2007 12:02:54 AM:
i dont know if its my blade or not but all the 729 rubbers that i try seem to fit me a lot better than the more expensive nittaku rubbers. i am a close to mid table all around-looper . ive tried mid ship sc 2.2, refoma 2.2, and regular midship 2.2 . for 729 ive tried 729 fx 2.2, god favored2.2, 729 super fx 2.2, sst cross 2.2, and lkt pro xp 2.2, and they are all good, i especially like the god favored and the lkt pro xp but does anyone know why the nittaku rubbers are so expensive compared to the better chinese ones?? ive heard that the chinese rubbers tend to wear out quicker than the japanese rubbers do but i replace them about once every 1-2 months so would it matter?? aim - johnboi1991 |
Advertisement: Order Friendship LKT Carbon Megaspin.net store |