Return to Topic Index |
Q: Pro's style (9)
Q: Pro's style
by MadCow 19 years ago
by MadCow 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Cur 19 years ago
by Cur 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by rolly 19 years ago
by rolly 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Dave 19 years ago
by Dave 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by MadCow 19 years ago
by MadCow 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by rhino 19 years ago
by rhino 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by rhino 19 years ago
by rhino 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by PETER 19 years ago
by PETER 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by PETER 19 years ago
by PETER 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Dave 19 years ago
by Dave 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Dave 19 years ago
by Dave 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by PETER 19 years ago
by PETER 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by PETER 19 years ago
by PETER 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Rod 19 years ago
by Rod 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by ZoranV 19 years ago
by ZoranV 19 years ago
Re: Q: Pro's style
by Dave 19 years ago
by Dave 19 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: Q: Pro's style) was posted by PETER, on 6/24/2005 3:41:11 PM:
Yes, it took hours to finish the game when two defensive players met in old days. I think we have less of defensive players today is because they know that you can never be number one with defensive style. I recently read an article where the author was complaining that these days there are only one style dominating the sport.... looping both back and forehand... and how he misses different styles like the old days... like blockers... choppers.... smashers... lookers... |