trans





Return to Topic Index

Bryce FX vs. Cermet (8)

 Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by Ponger 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by gravy 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by cole 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by Loopy 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by cole ely 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by Loopy 15 years ago
 Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by cole 15 years ago
Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet
by Shai 15 years ago


The following message (subject: Re: Bryce FX vs. Cermet) was posted by Shai, on 10/25/2004 4:33:46 PM:
You don't have any problem playing with it because you're not playing against strong players.

Using a rubber like Bryce FX in your level is a joke. Unfortunately many beginners buy a very fast rubber and put it on a carbon blade. The problem with that is that you won't improve that way. It might be easier for you to beat players weaker than you with it but your ball control and technique won't improve.

Just so you know, a pro could easily create as much spin with a 5 year old sheet of Joola Smash (or any other beginner's rubber) that you could create with Bryce FX, and maybe not even that much.

Report Abuse
Search Forum