Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft (7)

Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by Rod 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by Rod 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 19 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by Rod 19 years ago

The following message (subject: Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft) was posted by Rod, on 12/13/2006 4:06:51 PM:

Hey Sajbor how are ya man?

Tack C rocks and glues really well, but it's expensive., and not good for loops.pf4-1 as u say too slow, not quite as good as tack c, but a good chopping tool nonetheless...

I've been using Friendship 2000 Tackspeed with Transcend Sponge (made by u know who ;)) I really like it, its faster than pf4-1, and much better for loops, but not as spinny as tack c for chops...longish dwell time tho means u have to be wary when twiddling your ball doesnt fly high on the FH. Give it a go, it's a nice combo for those that mostly chop but like to throw in an attack.

I'm also using double fish 1615 on my bh (OX) really prefer it to 755 (ox) that i used for ages...more control close to table and more spin reversal for away chops.....not a big difference but say 15-20%, very cheap too!

Good luck mate!

Report Abuse