Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft (2)

Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by firetack 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by Rod 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by sajbor 18 years ago

Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft
by Rod 18 years ago

The following message (subject: Re: Tackiness C vs Donic quatro agenda soft) was posted by firetack, on 12/5/2006 11:18:30 AM:

I tried tackc 1.7 and quattro anaconda(not agenda?)1.8 on a butterfly defence alpha earlier this month,wasn`t sure which was going to be best for forehand/backhand so i tried out at club practise session,here¬s what i found.tack c is much tackier,and stays tacky for much longer,iwould say it offers more spin/rotation and control,this is the best chopping rubber i have used so far,however on forehand topspins were a bit flat due to high dwell time on soft blade,flat hitting was excellent though,i now use this rubber on backhand in league matches.
quattro anaconda:not as sticky as i was hoping,but did react better to speed glue(nice clicking sound),once again due to soft blade topspins were a bit flat although slight improvement on tack c,in a nutshell if your looking for one of the two for backhand rubber tackc should give you an edge

Report Abuse