Return to Topic Index |
ratings (3)
ratings
by arthur 19 years ago
by arthur 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Rick 19 years ago
by Rick 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Pete 19 years ago
by Pete 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Rick 19 years ago
by Rick 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Ronald 19 years ago
by Ronald 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Ronald 19 years ago
by Ronald 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by arthur 19 years ago
by arthur 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by dd 19 years ago
by dd 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by arthur redgate 19 years ago
by arthur redgate 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
A sidenote to you other posters
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
Re: A sidenote to you other posters
by cole 19 years ago
by cole 19 years ago
Re: A sidenote to you other posters
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: ratings) was posted by Pete, on 9/26/2005 6:07:38 PM:
Sorry, I disagree with Rick. After 10 months of practise, your rating should be at least 1800 if you want to have any future in this game. Have you considered other sports? It's pretty easy to get on the Jamaican olympic bobsled team... but table tennis? no, not even in Jamaica. |