-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Oversized Rackets
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
- Cases
- Cleaners
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
-
Apparel
-
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- Maxi Pong
- MK
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- Sponeta
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- Vinqui
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
| Return to Topic Index |
Sriver Fx - to max or not to max? (2)
Re: Sriver Fx - to max or not to max?by Aditya 21 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: Sriver Fx - to max or not to max?) was posted by Aditya, on 8/21/2005 5:13:25 AM:
| actually i prefer 1.9mm of thickness in sriver fx.yes the weight/control/speed/spin is significant |