Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL (1)

Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by khvn 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by gcollins 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by thomas 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by Kevin 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by tdd 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by khvn 20 years ago

Re: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL
by ken 20 years ago

The following message (subject: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL) was posted by khvn, on 5/10/2005 3:55:59 PM:

I've been experiment with Chinese rubbers for a month or so now. It's time to have a check point with all the Chinese rubber gurus in this forum on the 3 specimens in my test: Cream-MRS, Geospin Tacky and FX-EL.

So far, I'd say that the cure-all Cream has lived up to its reputation--It generally does everything reasonably well--block, push, loop, hit, etc. However, well-rounded as it is, Cream-MRS doesn't loop quite as nice as the softer-sponged Geospin Tacky. I found Geospin loops easier and got more gears than Cream. Lastly, FX-EL, the softest and lightest of the three. I found this rubber a tad high throw for my strokes. This must be due to its very soft sponge. I got the feeling that FX-EL is intended to be a Chinese economical response to the expensive soft German Donic rubbers. To me, FX-EL feels like a poor man's Coppa. Your thoughts?

Report Abuse